MAN ABOUT TOWN: A City in Retreat

man-about-townBy GEORGE SOUTHERN
Falls Church Times Staff

As I write this on a dreary, wet Monday afternoon, the City Council and the School Board are preparing to retreat. Shakespeare could not have orchestrated more appropriate weather, nor could our elected officials have chosen a better name. Because when conditions are this bad, a retreat is indeed required.

One definition of retreat is “a period of group withdrawal for prayer, meditation, or study.” Given the financial state of the City, all three options may be required.

Tonight (Nov. 30)  at 7 p.m., City Council and the School Board will retreat to MEH Middle School cafeteria. One item, and only one item, is on the agenda:

1. FY11 Finance discussion

That’s it. Assistant City Manager Cindy Mester’s 1-page cover memo describes the retreat as a time for “a comprehensive financial discussion for the FY 2011 budget development.”  She then injects some tragedy/comedy:

Time: 7:00 p.m. – 9:30 p.m.

That’s the comedy. A combined City Council/School Board meeting will do well to have recited the Pledge of Allegiance by 9:30. Now for the tragedy:

Refreshments – dinner, drinks beyond water will not be provided this year

So it’s Bring Your Own Drinks Beyond Water, just to set the appropriate tone. Hemlock, anyone?

Since misery loves company, Ms. Mester has provided a little Schadenfreude for the solemn occasion: background reading about others’ financial miseries. First on the list:

Virginia’s State Budget: A Train Wreck about to Happen”

That should cheer them up.

Then some more intimate reports: the financial miseries of our neighbors in Alexandria City and Arlington and Fairfax counties. They went on retreats, too.

Alexandria anticipates FY 2011 revenue to fall by about $20 million (from $530 million to $510 million).

Arlington tops that easily, with a projected revenue decline of $40-50 million (on an $880 million budget).

Then comes Papa Bear Fairfax County, overshadowing them all with a revenue drop of $232 million (on a $3.3 billion budget).

Presumably, the flood of red ink in neighboring jurisdictions should make us feel better. But in fact the comparisons make us look even worse, because proportionally our neighbors are in much less financial trouble:

Alexandria’s deficit: 3.8 percent

Arlington’s deficit: 5 percent

Fairfax County’s deficit: 7 percent

City of Falls Church’s deficit: 11 percent

Or in other words: our fiscal problem is three times as bad as Alexandria’s, twice as bad as Arlington’s, and one and a half times as bad as Fairfax County’s.

At the retreat, officials will mull the now-famous Nov. 16 “Tuohy memo” from our Chief Financial Officer. Were Mr. Tuohy’s bent a literary rather than a financial one, he might have quoted Dickens’ “Macawber Principle”:

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness.

Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.”

Applying the Macawber Principle to the City you get:

Annual income $59,433,871, annual expenditure $67,092,386, result disaster (or a whopping tax increase).

So the tug-of-war tonight at the retreat will be between raising taxes and cutting services. To avoid cutting services means increasing the tax rate from the present $1.07 to something in the vicinity of $1.30. That’s about a 20 percent increase. City Councilman Dave Snyder has already proclaimed that he won’t go along with that, which doesn’t really matter since he’s in the minority on most issues.

But what’s the alternative? Cutting the schools budget? You’ve just touched the “third rail” of City politics. Tampering with the schools is like cutting Social Security benefits. Do so at your electoral peril.

So, pass around the cold water, ladies and gentlemen (or anything Beyond Water which you might have brought along). It’s going to be a long retreat.

PrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterYahoo MailDeliciousAIMShare

By George Southern
November 30, 2009 

Comments

2 Responses to “MAN ABOUT TOWN: A City in Retreat”

  1. Melissa Teates (City of Falls Church) on December 1st, 2009 10:15 am

    We would all like to go back and fix the projection errors, but we would still have reached this moment even if we had predicted correctly that revenue in FY 2010 would be this low. We would still be in a position of either cutting services and/or raising the tax rate to balance 2011. Obviously, the city staff did fail in their projections and we would be better prepared if we had had accurate projections, but we would still be here.

    I am for a tax increase of 20 cents or more. We want the services then we need to pay. The actual tax increase will be reasonable with property assessments down. Most parents I know concur that a substantial tax increase is better than degrading our school system and city services.

    Along with the tax increase we need a real commitment from the Council and the City Manager that we will fix our budgeting process and our overall financial management. We also need a commitment that we have the best prices/services for our outside contracts and that the staffing we have is effective and correctly organized. These issues will be key in the next council election in May or in November.

    Additionally, we need to be very cognizant of the true challenges we have coming down the pipeline in regards to our school infrastructure and increasing school population.

  2. TFC on December 1st, 2009 1:00 pm

    I would find it a considerable burden to see my tax rise by $1200 to $1400 if we needed to add another .20 to the tax rate. I wonder how many residents might be in the same boat? The decisions will be hard for all sides. I think our residents on fixed incomes may be hit particularly hard….it’s a lot of extra money to budget.

Feel free to leave a comment. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your FULL NAME and CITY. All comments are subject to editing for courtesy and content.





Subscribe without commenting