<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASK THE TIMES: Are Broad Street Utility Poles Still Being Removed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/</link>
	<description>Falls Church City&#039;s Online Community Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Buschow</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-6133</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Buschow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=13444#comment-6133</guid>
		<description>Those poles have been there since the 60&#039;s when I was growing up.  Not sure what force and effect Mr. Miller&#039;s agreement had on anything.

On my comment on the Read Building I just heard from Bob Young and it was a proffer from the Spectrum to remove the poles, however the city can not get a necessary easement from Bedo&#039;s to allow it to happen.  I believe Stephen is looking into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those poles have been there since the 60&#8217;s when I was growing up.  Not sure what force and effect Mr. Miller&#8217;s agreement had on anything.</p>
<p>On my comment on the Read Building I just heard from Bob Young and it was a proffer from the Spectrum to remove the poles, however the city can not get a necessary easement from Bedo&#8217;s to allow it to happen.  I believe Stephen is looking into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Enright of Camden, Maine</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-6089</link>
		<dc:creator>John Enright of Camden, Maine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=13444#comment-6089</guid>
		<description>Back in the early seventies, Falls Church Mayor Hal Miller pushed for the removal of all telephone poles on Broad Street within the Central Business District, and made it a condition of the utility agreement that permits use by the utilities of the right-of-ways.  Was that obligation ignored or negotiated away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the early seventies, Falls Church Mayor Hal Miller pushed for the removal of all telephone poles on Broad Street within the Central Business District, and made it a condition of the utility agreement that permits use by the utilities of the right-of-ways.  Was that obligation ignored or negotiated away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coleman</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-6058</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=13444#comment-6058</guid>
		<description>Thanks Barry

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Barry</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Buschow</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-6057</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Buschow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=13444#comment-6057</guid>
		<description>The flower building was a by-right build with no proferrs required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flower building was a by-right build with no proferrs required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coleman</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=13444#comment-6056</guid>
		<description>What about in front of the Flower Building?  I think there are also utility poles there.  They were allowed to build out to the sidewalk.  Was the undergrounding of utility lines not part of the agreements for that building?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about in front of the Flower Building?  I think there are also utility poles there.  They were allowed to build out to the sidewalk.  Was the undergrounding of utility lines not part of the agreements for that building?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Buschow</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/13444/ask-the-times-are-broad-street-utility-poles-still-being-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-6055</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Buschow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=13444#comment-6055</guid>
		<description>The poles are also to be removed in front of the Read Building and that has been over 2 years now.  Bob Young told me he has already paid the city to have them removed.  Last I heard Verizon was holding that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poles are also to be removed in front of the Read Building and that has been over 2 years now.  Bob Young told me he has already paid the city to have them removed.  Last I heard Verizon was holding that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
