<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WATER WAR: City Appeals; Fairfax Water Seeks Dismissal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fallschurchtimes.com/15493/water-war-falls-church-files-appeal-fairfax-water-counters-citys-motions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/15493/water-war-falls-church-files-appeal-fairfax-water-counters-citys-motions/</link>
	<description>Falls Church City&#039;s Online Community Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Rankin (Falls Church)</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/15493/water-war-falls-church-files-appeal-fairfax-water-counters-citys-motions/comment-page-1/#comment-7246</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Rankin (Falls Church)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=15493#comment-7246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to pay less for water.  But if the option is to pay more and get a bunch of Fairfax County residents to pay more too, and then we get to spend that money on things (which is sounds like might come to an end), then I&#039;d rather spend more.

If all this legal stuff works out in favor of Fairfax County I assume we&#039;ll end up spending less for water, right?  Of course, it seems we&#039;ll spend proportionally more on real estate taxes to make up for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to pay less for water.  But if the option is to pay more and get a bunch of Fairfax County residents to pay more too, and then we get to spend that money on things (which is sounds like might come to an end), then I&#8217;d rather spend more.</p>
<p>If all this legal stuff works out in favor of Fairfax County I assume we&#8217;ll end up spending less for water, right?  Of course, it seems we&#8217;ll spend proportionally more on real estate taxes to make up for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Frost City of Falls Church</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/15493/water-war-falls-church-files-appeal-fairfax-water-counters-citys-motions/comment-page-1/#comment-7243</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Frost City of Falls Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=15493#comment-7243</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve had wildly different bills from time to time as well. Sometimes I can&#039;t figure out why, other times I think I know the reason (such as irrigating new plants all summer long). Our last bill was $60 less than the previous one.

I sure wouldn&#039;t mind paying FX Co. rates, though! Wyatt Shields once told a group that FX Co. water was subsidized, so they pay much less than we do--about a third as much, if I remember correctly. He also said that probably wouldn&#039;t last much longer, since those subsidies were funded by the economic growth that the Co. enjoyed. If I were in FX Co. and paying for FCC water, I&#039;d probably be pretty upset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had wildly different bills from time to time as well. Sometimes I can&#8217;t figure out why, other times I think I know the reason (such as irrigating new plants all summer long). Our last bill was $60 less than the previous one.</p>
<p>I sure wouldn&#8217;t mind paying FX Co. rates, though! Wyatt Shields once told a group that FX Co. water was subsidized, so they pay much less than we do&#8211;about a third as much, if I remember correctly. He also said that probably wouldn&#8217;t last much longer, since those subsidies were funded by the economic growth that the Co. enjoyed. If I were in FX Co. and paying for FCC water, I&#8217;d probably be pretty upset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail R. Opitz</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/15493/water-war-falls-church-files-appeal-fairfax-water-counters-citys-motions/comment-page-1/#comment-7179</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail R. Opitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=15493#comment-7179</guid>
		<description>Speaking of &quot;wreak even greater economic havoc,&quot; can someone PLEASE explain why our (two people) water bill has gone from $90 to $165?  These past two bills (which have been identical...to the penny) are through the roof!  I used to complain when they were $90!  $90 being the lowest over nineteen years...and lately, rapidly increasing to $165.   All sorts of excuses have been given (including, &quot;Perhaps someone comes in during the day and uses your shower?&quot;).  Just wondering if any others find bills seemingly out of line?  Is this where some of the surplus comes from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of &#8220;wreak even greater economic havoc,&#8221; can someone PLEASE explain why our (two people) water bill has gone from $90 to $165?  These past two bills (which have been identical&#8230;to the penny) are through the roof!  I used to complain when they were $90!  $90 being the lowest over nineteen years&#8230;and lately, rapidly increasing to $165.   All sorts of excuses have been given (including, &#8220;Perhaps someone comes in during the day and uses your shower?&#8221;).  Just wondering if any others find bills seemingly out of line?  Is this where some of the surplus comes from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
