<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water War Part 2: How City Lost Suit Against Fairfax County</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fallschurchtimes.com/2875/water-war-part-2-how-city-lost-suit-against-fairfax-county/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/2875/water-war-part-2-how-city-lost-suit-against-fairfax-county/</link>
	<description>Falls Church City&#039;s Online Community Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/2875/water-war-part-2-how-city-lost-suit-against-fairfax-county/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=2875#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Ms. Earman, you hit the nail on the head.  Wonder why that wasn&#039;t appealed?  Could it be because Mr. Thorpe was departing and didn&#039;t want to dig in any more?

The real question, which doesn&#039;t seem even asked during the trial as outlined above, is the Fairfax Co. administrative refusal to grant a building permit without a commitment to Fairfax Water, which seems to be more an anti-trust case.  Why wasn&#039;t that question brought forward?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Earman, you hit the nail on the head.  Wonder why that wasn&#8217;t appealed?  Could it be because Mr. Thorpe was departing and didn&#8217;t want to dig in any more?</p>
<p>The real question, which doesn&#8217;t seem even asked during the trial as outlined above, is the Fairfax Co. administrative refusal to grant a building permit without a commitment to Fairfax Water, which seems to be more an anti-trust case.  Why wasn&#8217;t that question brought forward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Earman</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/2875/water-war-part-2-how-city-lost-suit-against-fairfax-county/comment-page-1/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Earman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=2875#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>I have a question. How is possible that with the recent Fairfax County Circuit Court Action that a judge from Prince William or Loudoun was not called upon to preside over the motion?  A judge that is a Fairfax County resident, who gets paid by Fairfax County, and works in a facility paid for by Fairfax County, whose clerks are employees of Fairfax County  should not be able to rule on a question that would benefit a jurisdiction that pays him and appoints him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. How is possible that with the recent Fairfax County Circuit Court Action that a judge from Prince William or Loudoun was not called upon to preside over the motion?  A judge that is a Fairfax County resident, who gets paid by Fairfax County, and works in a facility paid for by Fairfax County, whose clerks are employees of Fairfax County  should not be able to rule on a question that would benefit a jurisdiction that pays him and appoints him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McCready</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/2875/water-war-part-2-how-city-lost-suit-against-fairfax-county/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McCready</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=2875#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>I agree that the writing is good, almost lyrical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the writing is good, almost lyrical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coleman</title>
		<link>http://fallschurchtimes.com/2875/water-war-part-2-how-city-lost-suit-against-fairfax-county/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fallschurchtimes.com/?p=2875#comment-986</guid>
		<description>Well writen.  Do you know if the City had opinions from outside counsel in 2007 that recommended filing suit against the Fairfax County Water Authority?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well writen.  Do you know if the City had opinions from outside counsel in 2007 that recommended filing suit against the Fairfax County Water Authority?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
